Legal Opinion

Hankins v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1927No. 25209PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

The plaintiff in error, convicted of embezzlement and duly sentenced to the penitentiary, comes up on 21 assignments of error. These are so grouped in his argument that they *351may be classified and treated inclusively under (1) hearsay testimony of a witness who audited the books and papers, (2) misconduct of the jury and of the county attorney, and (3) error in an instruction to the jury.

The trial lasted eight days and the record is voluminous, consisting of more than 1,000 pages of testimony, including more than 1,100 exhibits. A brief outline of the evidence will help to understand the case.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Secor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. ClementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Bode v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Mendel v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meyer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. State v. PekeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Jordan v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API