State v. Clements
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Houston county of having, while engaged in the private banking business, as member of a firm doing business under the name of the Fillmore County Bank, received a deposit knowing the bank was insolvent. From an order, Kingsley, J., denying a motion for a new trial defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Defendant was convicted under Laws 1895, c. 219, of having, as a member of the banking firm of Clements, Greenleaf & Todd, operating the Fillmore County Bank at Preston, Minnesota, received a deposit of money from one Catherine K. Mack, knowing such bank to be insolvent.
The Fillmore County Bank commenced its operations at Preston in 1886. It was a private concern (unincorporated), composed of the defendant, Julia F. Greenleaf, and Maurice R. Todd, who admittedly continued the partnership until October 19, 1894, when an agreement of dissolution was signed by the partners, under the terms of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Craft v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
- People v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Daniels v. PalmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.