Legal Opinion

People v. Lamb

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1955No. Crim. 5274PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of having forged a fictitious name on a hank check for the purpose of cheating a hotel and a bank (Pen. Code, § 470) and of having committed grand theft by feloniously taking a diamond ring of the value of $1,500 from one Frank Alten. By this appeal, he seeks a reversal on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment, errors in the conduct of the trial, and misdirection of the jury.

The Evidence Is Sufficient

About one month prior to the events about to be narrated, appellant had been released from the Los Angeles County Jail where he had been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. DormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. BoydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. HanzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. People v. DalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. GreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API