Legal Opinion

People v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1958No. Crim. 2768PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying motion for new trial after a jury’s verdict found appellant guilty of robbery.

We will first consider appellant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. There was evidence as follows: On October 4, 1956, appellant received possession of one Mary Todd’s 1950 green Chevrolet to perform engine repairs. About 7 p. m. on that day appellant and one John Sanders, a codefendant with appellant herein, began using Mary Todd’s car to drive around the Sacramento area. They called at the home of appellant’s sister…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. IsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. CorriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. People v. TenedorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. People v. JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API