Legal Opinion

People v. Hodges

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 13, 1957No. Crim. 5697PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendant appeals from judgment of conviction of three charges of grand theft 1 and from order denying motion for new trial. He also attempts to appeal from the verdict, which plainly is not appealable. (People v. Tompkins, 109 Cal.App.2d 215, 217 [240 P.2d 356].)

Appellant’s principal argument is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict with respect to each of the first three counts.

Defendant was business manager of Gardena Valley News, a concern engaged in publishing a newspaper in the city of Gardena. He had been contacted by Mr. Medric Spenard, an importer and exporter, who…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. Nor WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. WeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. FewkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. McManusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API