Legal Opinion

Beecham Enters., Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1992No. 11 W.D.Appeal Dkt. 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The question in this case is whether the equitable doctrine of vested rights applies so as to permit the continued use of a sign that exceeds the dimensional limits of the zoning ordinance.

The appellant, Motel Six, Inc., owns a four acre parcel of property in Kennedy Township, Allegheny County, on which, as the company’s name suggests, it operates a motel. The appellee, Beecham Enterprises, Inc., owns a sixteen acre parcel directly across the street from the Motel Six parcel, on which is located the company headquarters. Both properties are located in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Petrosky v. ZON. BD., UPPER CHICHESTER TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. West Bradford Township v. EvansCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Beecham Enterprises, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nettleton v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Rabenold v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. In Re Broad Mountain Development Co., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Harry A. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Carman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API