Legal Opinion

Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1970No. Appeal, No. 118PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

This appeal was brought from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which affirmed the decision of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh granting Mario DePasquale a variance from the side yard requirements of the zoning ordinance applicable to his property, and finding that the present use of the building on the property constitutes a nonconforming structure. Appellants, neighboring property owners who intervened below, contend that the court committed error of law and abuse of discretion in affirming that decision.

The background…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Crawford Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Rogalski v. Upper Chichester TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Nettleton v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Bailey v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Gro AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Filanowski v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API