Legal Opinion

Nettleton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2003No. 55 WAP 2002PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47 OPINION

LAMB, Justice.

This zoning appeal requires us to clarify the conceptual basis for our decision reported as Yocum Zoning Case, 393 Pa. 148, 141 A.2d 601 (Pa. 1958).

Appellants Elvidio Grande and Marianne DePlacido (Landowners) own an improved lot in the Seventh Ward of the City of Pittsburgh (City) known as 5301 Fifth Avenue (Property) in an RM-3, Residential Multi-Unit, Moderate Density zoning district as defined and regulated by the Pittsburgh Urban Zoning Code (Code). The Property is improved with a commercial one-story building seventeen feet in height with twenty-two basement…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. Darby Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Marshall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re Appeal of Realen Valley Forge Greenes AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Arter v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API