Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Bach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*608Brown, J.

Regarding the merits of the jury’s findings we think it sufficient to say that a study of the record convinces us that the questions cannot be decided as a matter of law and therefore the answers must remain as the jury gave them. While Mrs. Bailey testified that her speed was not over thirty-five miles per hour, which was the posted limit at the scene of the accident, and her counsel argued that his computations of estimated time spent in traveling estimated distances prove her speed to be within the limit, two disinterested witnesses placed it as not less than forty-five miles per…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standard Accident Insurance Co. v. RunquistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Anderson v. SeelowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pecor v. Home Indemnity Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lehner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Behling v. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Granger v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Maurine Huse, and Albert Huse, Parents and Next of Kin of David Huse, Deceased, and James Huse v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API