Granger v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoedon, J.
After the jury’s verdict, the court ordered the answers to the special verdict changed so as to find that the plaintiff was causally negligent as to management and control and also to reflect that such negligence on the part of the plaintiff was at least equal to that of the driver of the automobile insured by the defendant.
We conclude that the learned trial judge was correct in his first change but in error as to his second.
Upon this record, the trial judge was warranted in concluding that the plaintiff was unquestionably negligent as to management and control. When the plaintiff was 200…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- McGuiggan v. HillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Kraskey v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Bailey v. BachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Jankovich v. ArensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Metcalf v. Consolidated Badger Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Brunette v. DadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Drake v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Drake v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.