Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Watters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 28, 1980No. 15-79-02173, CA 16273PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

The wife appeals from the dissolution of marriage decree. She assigns as error the provision in the decree suspending husband’s obligation to make child support payments during the time husband is paying off the wife’s lien against real property awarded to the husband. The lien is $80,000.

The husband claims that the wife is getting most of the family assets by the award of the $80,000 lien. The trial court apparently found the value of the real property to be as testified to by the witness Brunton, a real estate appraiser. Using Brunton’s appraisals, the award of $80,000 to the wife was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Hockema v. HockemaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. In re the Marriage of McClellanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of EchanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. In re the Marriage of MahaffeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. In re the Marriage of MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. In re the Marriage of VanderzandenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. In re the Marriage of HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API