Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Vanderzanden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1981No. D16,010, CA 18842PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this dissolution proceeding husband contends that the trial court erred in requiring him to pay wife an unjust amount for child and spousal support and in granting him a judgment lien on the family home awarded to wife rather than requiring that the property be sold and the proceeds divided. We affirm the decree as modified herein.

Husband, age 48, and wife, age 44, were married for 24 years. Eight children were bom of the union, five of whom, ranging in age from 5 to 20, still live at home.

Husband works for the Oregon State Highway Department as a maintenance man, receiving $1,263 gross…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hockema v. HockemaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. In re the Marriage of WattersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of SlatskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of HughesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API