Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Mahaffey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1989No. CV 87 0421; CA A48647PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment, contesting the trial court’s award of spousal support and an interest in husband’s pension benefits to wife. Wife cross-appeals. On de novo review, we modify the judgment and affirm as modified.

The parties were married 20 years. Husband is 45 years old, and wife is 41. They have three children, ages 20,16 and 13. The 20-year-old attends college. Custody of the other two children was awarded to wife, subject to reasonable visitation by husband. Husband was required to pay wife $350 per month as spousal support for four years, plus child support of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of CollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. In re the Marriage of KiserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. In re the Marriage of KernanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. In re the Marriage of MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. David Michael Martin, Former Husband v. Dawn Turner Martin, Former WifeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API