Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Echanis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 3, 1985No. 18,870; CA A31626PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In this dissolution case husband seeks to terminate his spousal support obligation. The trial court found that his monthly payments of $900 to wife were part of the property division and are therefore not subject to modification. We hold that the payments are spousal support and modify the decree to reduce those payments to $350 per month.

Husband is 65 and wife is 55 years old. Their 22-year marriage ended in 1975. At that time, husband was a partner with a one-half interest in a beer and wine distributorship known as the Umatilla Distributing Company. By the time of the hearing in this…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hockema v. HockemaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of HoreskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of HardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Schaffer v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. In re the Marriage of EslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. In re the Marriage of StutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. In re the Marriage of WolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of ParesiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. In re the Marriage of SlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API