Legal Opinion

State v. Matusky

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 18, 1996No. 124 Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the trial court correctly applied the declaration against penal interest exception to the rule precluding admission of hearsay evidence. We shall hold that the trial court interpreted the exception too broadly, erroneously admitting collateral portions of the hearsay declaration that did not directly incriminate the declarant.

I

In May, 1993, Respondent Michael Stewart Matusky was indicted in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County on two counts of first-degree murder in connection with the stabbing deaths of Gertrude and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Michael Lee Matthews and Robert G. PraterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Gilberto Pablo AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Walter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API