Legal Opinion

Piccinini v. California Emergency Management Agency

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 2014No. A137275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

Appellant Joseph Piccinini was offered and accepted employment as a deputy chief in the California Emergency Management Agency. The Friday night before he was to report for work, he was told not to come because the position for which he was hired had been eliminated. He incurred expenses in reliance on his appointment and sued for damages. The state’s demurrers to Piccinini’s complaints were sustained. Because his first amended complaint stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action under Government Code section 19257, 1 we reverse.

BACKGROUND

In his first amended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. County of Santa Clara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Dion v. WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API