Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION
The issue presented in this case is whether the Southern California Rapid Transit District (RTD), a public corporation, has a duty to protect passengers aboard its buses from assaults by fellow passengers. We conclude that RTD does owe such a duty to its passengers and that RTD is not immune from liability under the facts…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.