Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1985No. L.A. 31917PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

The issue presented in this case is whether the Southern California Rapid Transit District (RTD), a public corporation, has a duty to protect passengers aboard its buses from assaults by fellow passengers. We conclude that RTD does owe such a duty to its passengers and that RTD is not immune from liability under the facts…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Davidson v. City of WestminsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Van Ort v. Estate of StanewichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API