Legal Opinion
Barnard-Curtiss Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1957No. 5497_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
244 F.2d 565
BARNARD-CURTISS COMPANY, and The Seaboard Surety Company, Surety, Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America for the use and benefit of D. W. FALLS CONSTRUCTION CO.; and Ace Construction Co., Appellees.
No. 5497.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
April 25, 1957.
Rehearing Denied May 23, 1957.
Robert S. Skinner, Raton, N. M. (Robertson & Skinner, Raton, N. M., and Arthur H. Lindeman, Minneapolis, Minn., were with him on the brief), for appellants.
Owen B. Marron and T. B. Keleher, Albuquerque, N. M. (John B. Tittmann, Albuquerque, N. M., was with them on the brief), for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Berg v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- James Morrow, Jr. v. Waldo Spiess and Modrall, Seymour, Sperling, Roehl & HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Barnard-Curtiss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Zack Metal Company v. S.S. Birmingham CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961