Legal Opinion
Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1957No. 5497PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by Barnard-Curtiss Company, herein called Barnard, from a judgment in favor of D. W. Falls Construction Company, herein called Falls, and a further judgment in favor of Ace Construction Company, herein called Ace. The action was instituted by Falls and Ace against Barnard under 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq., The Miller Act.
Barnard held a prime contract with the Bureau of Reclamation for the construction and repair of an irrigation system in New Mexico, known as the Vermejo Project. Barnard’s project carried a completion date of June 15, 1955. In January,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Berg v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Pipe & Steel Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- M. W. Zack Metal Co. v. The S.S. Birmingham CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Barnard-Curtiss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Steenberg Construction Company v. The Prepakt Concrete CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967