Legal Opinion
Barnard-Curtiss Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1958No. 5741PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
257 F.2d 565
BARNARD-CURTISS COMPANY, and The Seaboard Surety Company, Surety, Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of D. W. FALLS CONSTRUCTION CO.; and Ace Construction Co., Appellees.
No. 5741.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
July 1, 1958.
Petitions for Rehearing Denied July 24, 1958.
Alfred P. Davis, and James L. Tilly, Denver, Colo. (Tilly & Skelton, Wilbur M. Alter, Denver, Colo., and Arthur H. Lindeman, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel, were with them on the brief), for appellants.
Owen B. Marron, Albuquerque, N. M. (T. B. Keleher and John B. Tittmann,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Federal Surety Co. v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Barnard-Curtiss Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Carnegie, Phipps & Co. v. HoltMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Barnard-Curtiss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shea-S&m Ball, a Joint Venture v. Massman-Kiewit-Early, a Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979