Legal Opinion

Neuschafer v. McHale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. 81-1542; CA A31222PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

In this declaratory judgment action, the trial court declared that defendant McHale, “by virtue of a gift of a future interest therein,” acquired title to 1,103 shares of stock in American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) and two dividend reinvestment accounts. Plaintiffs appeal and contend that they did not possess the requisite donative intent to make a valid gift inter vivos. We reverse.

Our initial concern is the scope of our review. A declaratory judgment proceeding may be legal or equitable in character. Kuhn v. Heerwagen, 43 Or App 755, 757 n 1, 604 P2d 416 (1979). If it is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Allen v. HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Manning v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Johnson v. SteenOregon Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Sutherlin School District 130 v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Evancoe Ex Rel. Evancoe v. EvancoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Estate of Grove v. SelkenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Cox v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API