Legal Opinion

Stane v. Mettetal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1948No. 4-8538PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MoHaney, Justice.

This appeal stems from litigation which began on April 4, 1942, in which appellants, who are husband and wife, sought to enjoin appellees, who are also husband and wife, from closing a roadway across the land of appellees, which road afforded appellants the only ingress and egress to and from their land. A temporary order was entered granting the relief prayed on the filing of the complaint. Trial resulted in a decree modifying the temporary order to the extent of permitting the gate'.or gates on appellees’ line to be locked on furnishing appellants with a key. This decree…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Pattillo v. TolerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. Sanders v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  4. Robinson v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Robertson v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Local Union No. 656 v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Haberman v. Van ZandvoordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Ozark Bi-Products, Inc. v. BohannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Block v. Ark. Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Carter v. OlsinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API