Legal Opinion

Ladner v. Siegel (No. 4)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1929No. 4; Appeal, 282PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is the fourth appeal to this court in the present case and it is high time the controversy is put to rest. If appellants have been deprived of any right, or have been otherwise subjected to judicial misadventure, it is our duty to correct the error. Before that can be done, however, some right must appear to have been breached.

Appellees, for brevity called Siegel, owned a block of ground between 47th, 48th, Pine and Spruce Streets. He prosposed to build in its center a one-story garage, 160 by 200 feet, with basement, to accommodate in its entirety about.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Scott v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. West v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pennsylvania Co., Etc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API