Carter v. Olsin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
Appellant prosecutes this appeal, contending the trial court had no right to modify its order after the lapse of the term at which it was rendered where no statutory ground therefor was alleged or proven. The issue presented is strictly one of law, and the background and facts necessary to present this issue may be briefly and generally stated.' Many of these facts are set forth in a former appeal of this case. See: Carter v. Olsin, 226 Ark. 760, 293 S. W. 2d 890.
On the former appeal we held that appellant had the right to drive his cattle across appellee’s land…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Local Union No. 656 v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Stane v. MettetalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Spivey v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Bright v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
- Carter v. OslinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- West v. BelinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Karoley v. A. R. & T. ElectronicsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Haberman v. Van ZandvoordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
- West v. BelinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993