Legal Opinion

Ozark Bi-Products, Inc. v. Bohannon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1954No. 5-435PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

The Chancery Court, on petition of appellees, permanently enjoined appellant from operating its rendering plant; 1 and on this appeal appellant argues:(1) “It was error for the Trial Court to permanently enjoin the operation of appellant”; and(2) “The permanent injunction should be modified so as to permit appellant to operate, if the noxious and offensive odors can be eliminated from its operation, otherwise the injunction to be made permanent.”

Northwest Arkansas has developed an extensive broiler industry; and in the slaughtering and processing of the broilers for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Durfey v. ThalheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  2. Smith v. Western Hide & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Huddleston v. BurnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Sarraillon v. StevensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Swaim v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southeast Arkansas Landfill, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Taylor v. Zanone PropertiesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Flippin v. McCabeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Knight v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API