Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Meyerton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1934No. 29,606PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSEN, Justice.

■ Defendant Axel W. Meyerton appeals from a judgment against him. The action was dismissed as to defendant R. W. Munson, and Meyerton is hereinafter referred to as defendant.

The action is one to recover damages, for fraudulent representations claimed to have been made by defendant to induce plaintiff to purchase certain machinery, equipment, supplies, and business of a milk and cream distributing plant and to lease the part of a creamery building wherein said business was conducted at St. Cloud, Minnesota. The plant and equipment were owned or controlled by defendant. ' ,

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Townsend v. JahrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Barthelemy v. Foley Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Magnuson v. BurgessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  5. Lowrey v. DingmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API