Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2009No. E2006-02225-SC-R11-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

*914WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

The Court today invalidates the Unauthorized Substances Tax on the ground that it exceeds the General Assembly’s taxing power under Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee Constitution. The Court reaches this conclusion despite the precedents requiring us to interpret statutes in a manner that sustains, rather than defeats, their constitutionality. Even though I concur with the Court’s conclusions that the Unauthorized Substances Tax does not run afoul of the state and federal constitutional prohibitions against double…

2Cases cited104 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API