Gaedeke v. Staten Island Midland Railroad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from municipal court, borough of Richmond, Second district. Action by Barthold 0. Gaedeke against the Staten Island Midland Railroad Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.
The very full examination which this case received in the court below, and the able opinions delivered by the learned judge in the decision of this and the Cortelyou Case, require little to be said by us. We may safely rest our decision of this case thereon. It is, however, so earnestly insisted by the appellant that the clause in the contract made by the defendant with the commissioners of the town of Southfield is void that we conclude to express our views thereon. It is conceded that the railroad company applied to the commissioners for their consent to lay its tracks in the highway, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beekman v. . Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Mongeon v. . People of the State of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- People Ex Rel. Kingsland v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Matter of Kings County Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- People Ex. Rel. West Side Street Railway Co. v. BarnardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Gaedeke v. Staten Island M. R. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Gaedeke v. Staten Island Midland RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900