Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Kingsland v. . Palmer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1873PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The objections made on behalf of the appellant to the order appealed from will be noticed in their order.

1. It is objected that the act under which the services were rendered, for which compensation is sought to be recovered in this proceeding, is unconstitutional, upon the sole ground that the office created by the act was an existing office at the time of the adoption of the Constitution of 1846, the duties of which were then performed by county officers; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. The People v. . PinckneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Stridde v. SaroniWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. MannNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hequembourg v. City of DunkirkNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hankins v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. In re Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Colbert v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API