Legal Opinion

Gaedeke v. Staten Island M. R. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for reargument. Denied. For former opinion, see 60 Y. Y. Supp. 598.

1Per curiam

It is claimed that, in the decision hitherto rendered by us (43 App. Div. 514, 60 N. Y. Supp. 598), we have overlooked the amendments made to the highway law of the state by chapter 333 of the Laws of 1893 and chapter 375 of the Laws of 1895. Section 58 of the highway law reads:

“The county roads in any county shall be exclusively under the jurisdiction of the board of supervisors and the county engineer of the county, and exempt from the jurisdiction of the highway officers, or officers performing the duty of highway commissioners of the several towns and villages in which such county roads…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gaedeke v. Staten Island Midland RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaedeke v. Staten Island Midland RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API