Legal Opinion
Alameda County Social Services Agency v. Z.G.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 2009No. A123994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAMBDEN, J.
In 1992, Z.C. was removed from her mother’s custody immediately after being bom. Z.G. (Z.G. or the guardian) was appointed the guardian for Z.C. at a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.1 Years later, after the Alameda County Social Services Agency (the agency) sought a more restrictive placement for Z.C., the juvenile court held a section 366.3 hearing. The court did not terminate the guardianship. Rather, it ordered reunification services to Z.G. to maintain the legal guardianship. The agency agrees that reunification services are appropriate,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Phelps v. StostadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Do Kyung K.California Court of Appeal · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Francisco Human Services Agency v. Felicia C.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sonoma County Human Services Department v. J.H.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. G.F.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- T.W. v. Super. Ct. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2014