Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Anderson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1992No. Nos. 60718 to 60728 and 60782 to 60796PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James D. Sweeney, Judge.

On July 17, 1990, the defendants-appellants, twenty-six abortion protestors, pled no contest to a single charge of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor under Cleveland Municipal Ordinance 605.03. Appellants were sentenced by the trial court to the maximum allowable fine of $100 plus costs, with costs suspended.

After hearing the sentence of the court, the appellants informed the court that although they had the ability to pay the fine they would not pay the fine because of religious and philosophical beliefs. They further requested that they be sent to the county…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Galdino Juarez-Casares v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. KhongOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. City of North Olmsted v. CipitiOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Mentor v. MeyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. RowlandOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API