State v. Meyer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
In this appeal from a conviction for tampering with a coin machine, we revisit the issue of when the trial court is required under R.C. 2947.14(A) to conduct a hearing to determine a defendant’s ability to pay a fine. Specifically, we examine whether the statute’s language requiring a hearing “at the time of sentencing” should be construed literally. Because other language in the statute clearly indicates that the hearing requirement is not triggered until the trial court decides to incarcerate the offender for failure to pay the fine, and because constitutional concerns do not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Cleveland v. LeneghanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.