Legal Opinion
State v. Khong
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1985No. 49683PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.
In order to reach the issues raised in the instant appeal of the contempt conviction of Assistant County Prosecutor William E. Gerstenslager, it is necessary to examine the proceedings of the criminal trial styled State v. Phuoc Chan Khong, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-186386.
Khong was indicted on a single count of rape which allegedly occurred on September 14, 1983. Appellant Gerstenslager was the assistant county prosecutor assigned to prosecute the case for the state of Ohio.
On November 11, 1983, Richard J. Marco, counsel for the defendant, filed a demand for discovery in accordance with Crim. R.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. ShuttlesworthOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Contemnor Caron, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2000
- In Re Seal Record of No BillOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Cleveland v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.