Legal Opinion
Farrell Lines Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 19, 1974No. 42-72PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowen, Chief Judge
Farrell Lines Inc. contracted with the United States to provide shipping service on essential foreign trade routes for a period of 20 years starting on January 1,1958. Under the contract, the Government was required to pay an operating-differential subsidy. The Maritime Subsidy Board of the Maritime Administration decided that plaintiff’s payments to its employees’ training funds and plaintiff’s costs (in wages and fund contributions) for the cadets or apprentices aboard its ships as a part of a private training program are ineligible for subsidy.1 The Board’s decisions were *487affirmed by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cammarano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Trustees of Indiana University v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Champagne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Prudential Lines, Inc. v. United States Maritime Administration (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Brier Manufacturing Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.