Legal Opinion

BADGER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1967No. 42912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. The plaintiff’s comprehensive homeowner’s insurance policy covered appurtenant private structures, as to which it was provided: “This coverage does not include (a) any structure used in whole or in part for commercial, manufacturing or farming purposes.” The garage burned. The evidence is undisputed that two activities were being conducted therein: (1) the plaintiff’s husband brought in approximately eight used stock racing cars per month which he repaired in the garage and then resold, and (2) a part of the garage had been rented out to other persons who had conducted a tire…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Southern Feed Stores Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. State Farm Fire &C. Co. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Salmon v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Durham v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API