State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
A portion of the well reasoned opinion of the trial court overruling the motion for judgment n.o.v. is here quoted: “Our courts have held that ‘in the construction of a contract, the words used therein will generally be accepted in their usual common significance.’ Insurance Company of North America vs. Samuels, 31 Ga. App. 258, Indemnity Company of *744Newark, N. J., vs. Yearwood, 50 Ga. App. 646, and that ‘in construing a policy of insurance so as to arrive at the true intention of the parties, the ordinary legal and literal meaning of the words must be given effect when it is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Asbury v. Indiana Union Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Southern Guaranty Insurance v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- City of Valdez v. Valdez Development CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.