Legal Opinion

Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 1956No. 36020PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. Where an insurance company places limitations upon the authority of its agents to enter into contracts of insurance and such limitations are contained only in the policy itself, such limitations are to be deemed as referring to matters occurring subsequently to the issuance of the policy, and do not apply to facts or conditions which were existing at the inception of the contract. “In such a case the knowledge of the agent is the knowledge of the insurer, and if a policy is issued with knowledge by the agent of a fact or condition which by the terms of the contract would render it void,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. BessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  4. Athens Mutual Insurance v. Ledford & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sargent v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Lucas v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. BADGER MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Lucas v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API