Legal Opinion
Quon v. Stans
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 6, 1970No. Civ. A. C-70-27PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION
GERALD S. LEVIN, District Judge.
I Statement of the Case
Plaintiffs bring this class action on their own behalf and on behalf of all other “Chinese impoverished, non-English speaking persons of the Chinatown district in San Francisco, California,” who allegedly will not be counted in the taking of the 1970 United States Census. Plaintiffs contend that the basic method of enumeration proposed to be used by defendants, that of census questionnaires mailed out to known dwelling places and then mailed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Dymo Industries, Inc. v. Tapeprinter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd. v. Avis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Speedry Products, Inc. v. Dri Mark Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Atlantic & Gulf/Panama Canal ZoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Camden v. PlotkinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- Melvin A. Marshall v. District of Columbia Government (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- West End Neighborhood Corporation v. StansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- Kaiser Trading Co. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Com. of Mass. v. MosbacherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.