Com. of Mass. v. Mosbacher
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLOCK, District Judge.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and two of its registered voters bring this action challenging the manner by which the Congress of the United States has apportioned the 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives. The plaintiffs contend 1) that the method for allocating House seats among the 50 states violated the constitutionally grounded principle of “one person, one vote” (the “apportionment claim”); and 2) that the method used in the 1990 census for counting federal employees serving overseas was improper (the “overseas census claims”).
The plaintiffs…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited72 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Franklin v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Goldstein v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1996
- Boyajian v. DeLuca (In Re Remington Development Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
- Senate of California v. MosbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Nat'l Ass'n v. Bureau of the CensusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.