Legal Opinion

State v. Rubio-Landa

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 4, 1991No. 90CR0105; CA A66093PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals his convictions for delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The indictment charged, in addition to possession and delivery, that the crimes “occurred as part of a drug cultivation, manufacture, or delivery scheme or network” under OAR chapter 253, division 4, appendix 4. Defendant filed a demurrer, asserting, in part, that the “scheme or network” language is vague and in violation of the Oregon Constitution, Article I, section 20. In State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76 (1991), we held that the “scheme or network”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. Andrade-TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. Andrade-TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API