Legal Opinion

State v. Andrade-Torres

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1991No. C900254CR; CA A65847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was indicted for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance as ‘ ‘part of a drug cultivation, manufacture or delivery scheme or network.” He demurred to the indictment. The demurrer was overruled. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was convicted of both charges.

The court erred by overruling the demurrer. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev allowed 311 Or 349, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991). Because the demurrer should have been granted, the other claims of error are moot.

Reversed and remanded with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Andrade-TorresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. CostelloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. CovenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. GrangerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. Morales-AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API