Legal Opinion

Paul v. . Davenport

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1940PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

If the alleged codicil is valid as such and conveys a defeasible fee to Susan L. Blount then the plaintiff, daughter of W. A. Hodges, is the person to whom title to said land reverts. If the paper writing relied on by plaintiff as a codicil is void and of no effect then the defendants are the owners of the premises.

A will, to he sufficient in law to convey any estate, real or personal, must have been written in the testator’s lifetime and signed by him, or by some other person in his presence and by his direction, and subscribed in his presence by two witnesses at least. C. S., 4131.

The right…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. R. S. Pullen v. the Commissioners of Wake County.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Burriss v. . StarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Spencer v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. In Re Will of FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fullam v. BrockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Jones v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Wescott v. First & Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Yount v. YountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. In Re the Will of MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API