Legal Opinion

Krauss v. Keibler-Thompson Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 22, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 75-360PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

Robert B. Krauss, Jr. arid Ethelene F. Krauss (hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”) filed this action seeking damages for injuries suffered when Robert B. Krauss, Jr. was struck by part of a machine owned, maintained, and operated by defendant Keibler-Thompson Corp. The plaintiff has filed a motion to strike the affirmative defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk asserted by the defendant. There are several procedural problems which must be addressed before examining the merits of this motion.

The plaintiff has characterized…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elmer Bernstein v. Universal Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Uniroyal, Inc. v. HellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Bowl-Mor Company, Inc. v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1972
  4. Stonybrook Tenants Ass'n v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  5. Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do SulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Billie Williams v. Jader Fuel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Ciminelli v. CablevisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  3. Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. United States v. ManzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  5. Marco Holding Co. v. Lear Siegler, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API