Legal Opinion

Bowl-Mor Company, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 24, 1972PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Chancellor:

Bowl-Mor Company, Inc., brought this action against Brunswick Corporation for injunctive relief and damages for tortious interference with present and prospective relationships with its customers. Injunc-tive relief was granted and the case proceeded on the damage claim but became inactive for some three years following Bowl-Mor’s bankruptcy; trustees in bankruptcy now prosecute it for plaintiff.

A

Bowl-Mor was organized in 1954 to manufacture automatic duckpin machines for use in bowing alleys throughout the United States. It began to produce tenpin (“large ball”) bowling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Owen v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  4. Friday v. SmootSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Reichman v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  2. Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
  4. Glass v. GlassSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  5. Irwin & Leighton, Inc. v. W.M. Anderson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API