Legal Opinion

Brant v. Sweet Clinic

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1932No. 23469. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted by Albert Brant and Lorraine Brant, a marital community, to recover against a practicing physician and surgeon and a medical clinic corporation for alleged malpractice in removing a growth or cyst from the throat of plaintiff wife. Plaintiffs alleged that the surgeon

“. . . wholly failed to follow the established practice and to conform to the proper standards as practiced by his school of surgery in similar localities in performing said operation, and the said defendants, while associated together under their employment by the plaintiffs, and in disregard of their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sawdey v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Howatt v. CartwrightWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Brear v. SweetWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Peterson v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  2. Adamski v. Tacoma General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Richison v. NunnWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Giusti v. C. H. Weston Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API