Legal Opinion

Kmart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 2001No. 2475 C.D. 2000PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Kmart (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to deny Employer’s suspension petition. We also affirm.

On April 27, 1987, Gloria Williams (Claimant) sustained a work-related herniated lumbar disc and, as a result, received weekly workers’ compensation benefits. In September 1998, Employer filed a suspension petition alleging that, as of July 9, 1998, Claimant was offered work within her physical capabilities but that she failed to follow through on the position in good…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Ohm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Bissland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lindemuth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Nelson v. HeslinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Rutter v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Palaschak v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Beisswanger v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API