Legal Opinion

Ohm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 1995PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Before this Court is an appeal by Karen Ohm (Claimant) from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) granting, in part, the appeal of Caloric Corporation (Defendant) and amending the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to terminate Claimant’s compensation benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) on April 22, 1992. We reverse the decision of the Board and remand for the reinstatement of Claimant’s benefits. The facts are as follows.

On December 24, 1990, Claimant filed a petition for reinstatement of compensation alleging that she…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Somerset Welding & Steel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Connor v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Coover v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kmart v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Mitchell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Kurpiewski v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Hill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Sears Logistic Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API