Legal Opinion
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Eastern Conference of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1995No. Nos. 94 Civ. 1950 (DNE), 94 Civ. 2247 (DNE)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
In the instant consolidated action, defendants are the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT” or “Union”) and IBT General President Ronald Carey (“Carey”). Plaintiffs are the Central Conference of Teamsters, the Eastern Conference of Teamsters, the Southern Conference of Teamsters, the Western Conference of Teamsters (“the Conferences”), and various officers who represent these respective conferences.1 The IBT brought an action seeking declaratory relief pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“the LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David T. Thompson and Thompson Communications Companies, Inc. v. Davor G. GjivojeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- In re SpencerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1980
3Cited by34 opinions
- Kam-Ko Bio-Pharm Trading Co. v. Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Thomas v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Cognetta v. BonavitaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Miller v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.