Legal Opinion

O-D

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1998No. ID 3334PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3334 In re O-D-, Respondent Decided January 8, 1998 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Presentation by an asylum applicant of an identification document that is found to be coun- terfeit by forensic experts not only discredits the applicant’s claim as to the critical elements of identity and nationality, but, in the absence of an explanation or rebuttal, also indicates an over- all lack of credibility regarding the entire claim. FOR RESPONDENT: Ronald S. Salomon, Esquire, New York, NY BEFORE: Board En Banc: VACCA,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Corovic v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Zaman v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Fatjon Sterkaj Amemona Sokoli-Sterkaj v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Zhen Nan Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API